Meet the Bloggers

Vaune Carr, Principal Consultant, BT Global Services

Rob Jamison, Manager, Network Intelligence, Managed Security Solutions Group, BT Global Services

Jill Knesek, Chief Security Officer, BT Global Services

Sushila Nair, Product Manager, Managed Security Solutions Group, BT Global Services

Ben Rothke, Senior Security Consultant, BT Global Services

Pete Russo, Senior Marketing Manager, BT Global Services

Bruce Schneier, Chief Security Technology Officer, BT Global Services

Ray Stanton, Global Head of BT’s Business Continuity, Security & Governance Customer Capability Unit

Jim Tiller, Vice President, Security Professional Services, North America, BT Global Services

Toby Weir-Jones, Vice President of Product Development, Managed Security Solutions Group, BT Global Services

Twitter Blogroll About BT

Posts tagged Card Breach

Friday, March 5, 2010

Past the Point of PCI

By:   Sushila Nair, Product Manager, Managed Security Solutions Group, 

               BT MSSG      & 

          Sanjay Mehta, Senior Vice President, Breach Security

The nirvana of that moment in time when you are completely secure without a single vulnerability in sight is unfeasible and, even if it were possible, it would be fleeting.  Despite our fondest wishes for this moment, we accept the fact that our networks are vulnerable and are in a constant state of flux, causing the vulnerabilities to alter and the risks to change.  Organizations struggle with how to continue to develop their core business while managing their risk and doing it all with fewer people and resources than they had last year.  The only way this is possible is to work smarter – but how does that translate into practice?

We accept that our security is flawed, so it becomes critical that we place security devices wherever we have high or unacceptable risk.  It is essential that the security alerts from security products like WAFS, firewalls, IDS/IPS as well as host information and application logs are centralized.  The devices we select are critical and should be chosen in line with risk.  It is worth bearing in mind that web applications are one of our largest areas of risk and were one of the key areas of focus in PCI DSS 1.2 which was based on the forensics of card breaches.

Once the devices are selected, then the complexity of managing this new technology comes into place and again, outsourcing is a serious option for companies that are constrained by head count.  The footprints of what has happened on our network is in our log files, and it’s impossible to check the multitude of consoles for the vast array of product that we have, so it is critical we centralize our log files and have the capability to correlate and look for patterns of attacks.  Unfortunately, security breaches are not limited to 9 to 5 or business hours, so our security monitoring framework must be built to take this intelligence, look for patterns of attacks and be manned 24×7.

This week’s RSA Conference pinpointed the problem of treating compliance as a single point in time. 

Most companies breathe a sigh of relief once PCI compliance is “achieved” via an audit or code review.  IT professionals move on to the next priority, and often, compliance “maintenance” is forgotten.  In doing so, they fail to understand that audits and code reviews are outdated the moment they are completed.  Web applications continue to be developed and altered, and as a result, continued compliance can’t be ensured with the “one-time look” that occurs with audits and code reviews.  And it would certainly be cost-prohibitive to conduct an audit or review with each application change.

Fortunately, continuous PCI compliance can be achieved using a web application security solution that provides real-time, continuous security for all protected web applications. 

In today’s compliance landscape, it’s simply not enough to know that a problem exists.  Sophisticated web application security solutions help companies mitigate problems.  Organizations need to have a real-time solution – not just a single look in time – to be truly secure and PCI compliant.

Here is more information on how vulnerability scans and code reviews compare to web application firewalls:

Vulnerability Scans and
Code Reviews
VS. Web Application Firewalls
Looks at one web application at a single point in time. Provides real-time, continuous security for all protected web applications.
 

Must be repeated for each application change.

 

Profiles each application’s acceptable behavior and automatically learns changes.

 

May not cover every line of code.

 

Secures the entire web application.

 

Can result in inconsistent findings due to vendor interpretations.

 

Provides factual information on vulnerabilities.

 

Does not fix vulnerabilities that are found.

 

Serves as a “virtual patch” that protects each application’s vulnerabilities.

 

Is expensive.

 

Offers immediate ROI.

subscribe - log in